Source: Computational Materials Science, Volume 266
Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Филолог заявил о массовой отмене обращения на «вы» с большой буквы09:36。关于这个话题，WPS官方版本下载提供了深入分析
特朗普聲稱已為美國爭取到18兆美元投資。他表示：「在12個月內，我爭取到超過18兆美元從全球各地湧入的（投資）承諾。」
，详情可参考搜狗输入法2026
实用、好用的 正版软件，少数派为你呈现 🚀，详情可参考safew官方版本下载
LSTM + duration prediction